Field Sobriety Tests in Colorado: Are They Reliable
Driving under the influence (DUI) is a significant concern in Colorado, leading to stringent measures by law enforcement to detect and deter impaired driving. One of the primary tools used by police officers in Colorado to determine if a driver is impaired by alcohol or drugs is the field sobriety test (FST). These tests are designed to assess a driver's physical and cognitive abilities, which can be impaired by alcohol or drugs. However, the reliability of field sobriety tests has been a topic of debate among legal experts, law enforcement, and the public. This article explores the components of field sobriety tests in Colorado, their reliability, and the factors that can influence their accuracy.
Understanding Field Sobriety Tests
Field sobriety tests are a series of physical and cognitive exercises administered by police officers to determine if a driver is under the influence of alcohol or drugs. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has standardized three tests known as the Standardized Field Sobriety Tests (SFSTs):
-
Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (HGN) Test: This test measures the involuntary jerking of the eyes that occurs when a person is intoxicated. During the test, the officer will ask the driver to follow a moving object, such as a pen or flashlight, with their eyes. The officer looks for distinct eye movements that indicate impairment.
-
Walk-and-Turn Test: This test assesses the driver's ability to follow instructions and perform tasks that require balance and coordination. The driver is asked to take nine steps in a straight line, heel-to-toe, turn on one foot, and return in the same manner. The officer observes for signs of imbalance, difficulty in following instructions, and other indicators of impairment.
-
One-Leg Stand Test: In this test, the driver is asked to stand on one leg for approximately 30 seconds while counting aloud. The officer watches for signs of swaying, using arms for balance, hopping, or putting the foot down, which may indicate impairment.
The Reliability of Field Sobriety Tests
While field sobriety tests are widely used by law enforcement, their reliability is a contentious issue. Several factors can affect the accuracy of these tests, leading to false positives or false negatives.
Factors Affecting Reliability
-
Subjectivity: One of the main criticisms of field sobriety tests is their subjective nature. The interpretation of the test results is largely at the discretion of the administering officer. Factors such as the officer's training, experience, and biases can influence the assessment.
-
Physical Conditions: Various physical conditions unrelated to alcohol or drug impairment can affect a person's performance on field sobriety tests. Conditions such as injuries, obesity, age, and certain medical conditions can impair balance and coordination.
-
Environmental Conditions: The environment in which the tests are conducted can also impact their reliability. Poor lighting, uneven surfaces, adverse weather conditions, and traffic noise can all affect a driver's ability to perform the tests accurately.
-
Nervousness and Anxiety: Being pulled over by the police and subjected to field sobriety tests can be a highly stressful experience. Nervousness and anxiety can affect a person's performance, potentially leading to inaccurate results.
-
Alcohol Tolerance: Individuals with a high tolerance for alcohol may not exhibit clear signs of impairment despite having a high blood alcohol concentration (BAC). Conversely, individuals with low tolerance may show signs of impairment at lower BAC levels.
Scientific Validity
The scientific validity of field sobriety tests has also been questioned. Studies have shown varying degrees of accuracy for the different tests. For instance, the HGN test is considered the most reliable of the three, with a reported accuracy rate of around 77% in detecting BAC levels above the legal limit. The walk-and-turn and one-leg stand tests have lower accuracy rates, around 68% and 65%, respectively.
Legal Challenges to Field Sobriety Tests
Given the concerns about their reliability, field sobriety tests are often challenged in court. Defense attorneys may argue that the tests were improperly administered, that the conditions were not conducive to accurate results, or that the driver's performance was affected by factors other than intoxication. Successfully challenging the results of field sobriety tests can lead to the dismissal of DUI charges or reduction of penalties. If you’ve been suspected of a DUI, contact a Denver DUI lawyer at Baker Law Group.
The Role of Chemical Tests
In Colorado, if a driver is suspected of DUI, they are often subjected to chemical tests such as breath, blood, or urine tests to measure their BAC or the presence of drugs. These tests are generally considered more reliable than field sobriety tests. However, refusal to take these tests can result in immediate penalties, including license suspension.
Field sobriety tests are a crucial tool for law enforcement in Colorado to detect impaired driving. However, their reliability is influenced by various subjective and objective factors. While the standardized tests provide a structured method for assessing impairment, their accuracy is not absolute. Drivers subjected to these tests should be aware of their rights and the potential for inaccuracies. Legal challenges to the results of field sobriety tests are common and can be successful, particularly when the tests are administered under less-than-ideal conditions or when the driver has physical or medical conditions that affect their performance.
In conclusion, while field sobriety tests play a vital role in DUI enforcement in Colorado, their reliability is not foolproof. Both law enforcement and drivers must recognize the limitations of these tests and ensure that the results are interpreted with caution and fairness. The ultimate goal is to balance the need for public safety with the rights of individuals, ensuring that DUI charges are based on accurate and reliable evidence.